Legal Opinion
Utah Department of Transportation v. Rayco Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1979No. 15265PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Defendant Rayco, the owner of a shopping center and supermarket situated thereon, appeals from a judgment rendered in an eminent domain proceeding. Defendant seeks a new trial.
We reverse and remand for a new trial, in accordance with this opinion. Costs to *483Rayeo. All statutory references are to U.C.A. 1953.
The matter was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict of $99,963.65 for damages; of this, $38,028.00 was for the fair market value for the land taken, and $61,935.65 was for severance damages. Defendant made motions for an additur, or in the alternative, for a new…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- San Diego Professional Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Shell v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Hildale v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- STATE BY COM'R v. WeiswasserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Utah Department of Transportation v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Carpet Barn v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.