Legal Opinion

Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. Carlson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1943No. 6444PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Justice.

The plaintiff Provo River Water Users’ Association brought this action to condemn a tract of 18.75 acres of land in Wasatch County. Part of this tract is to be flooded by a reservoir being constructed in Provo canyon, and the remaining part was taken for relocation of a railroad necessitated by flooding an area where the tracks were formerly located. This improvement is connected with the Deer Creek reclamation project.

At the time of trial and for some years prior thereto, the defendant Hyrum B. Carlson was the owner of said tract of 18.75 acres. About 14.4 acres consisted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Road Commission v. District Court, Fourth Judicial Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Stockdale v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Block v. Salt Lake Rapid Transit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hoeft v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  5. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. AdelmeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  3. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency v. Thirteen Parcels of Land in Squares 859, 912, 934 & 4068Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Lewis v. Worldwide Imports, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API