Legal Opinion
I. & G. N. R. R. v. Goldstein
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 25, 1884No. 3024PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Williamson County.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Will-son, J.
§ 2 7 4. Reasonable regulation of railroad company; requiring passengers to exhibit tickets. Appellant adopted the following rule: “Rule 15. Conductors are required to station their brakemen and train porter on the depot platforms where the trains stop and have them examine tickets, allowing no one to get aboard without a ticket *207or pass.” Held, that this was a reasonable regulation, and is not in conflict with section 9 of the act of April 10, 1883, or in any way affected by said act. [Gen. Laws, 18th Leg. p. 70.] Nor is it in conflict with any other law of this state.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hibbard v. . N.Y. and Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Townsend v. . N.Y. Cen. H. River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. VandyneIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Falkner v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Breen v. Texas & Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hall Oil Co. v. BarquinWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Taylor v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1853