Falkner v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.

The complaint of the appellant, against the appellee, in this case, avers, that he entered the car of. a freight train belonging to the appellee, as a passenger, and tendered the fare to the conductor, who refused to receive it, but stopped the train and ejected the appellant from the ear.

*370The complaint contains three paragraphs, but they are not different in legal effect. Ro question is made upon the complaint.

The appellee answered,

1st. The general denial; and,

2d. As follows:

That, at the time and before the occasion complained of, the appellee kept constantly equipped and furnished a great…