Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. Vandyne
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.
The complaint of the appellee, against the appellant, avers, that the appellant was operating their railroad, running from Winamac, in Pulaski county, to Logansport, in Cass county; that they were common carriers of passengers; that he purchased a ticket for a passage from Winamac to Logansport; that when he applied for entrance and tried to go into the appellant’s passenger car, he was prevented by the employees of the road, expelled therefrom, and thrown down upon the platform, etc.
There is a second paragraph of complaint substantially the same as the first.
The sufficiency of each paragraph…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NuzumIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- St. Louis & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. MyrtleIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ApplewhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railroad v. Van HoutenIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Falkner v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hillman v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Lige v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Hall v. Memphis & Charleston R.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1882
- Magill v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Sage v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.