Legal Opinion

Hibbard v. . N.Y. and Erie R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1857PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In my opinion, the learned judge before whom this case was tried committed two capital errors; First. He refused to charge the jury that the plaintiff was bound to conform to the rules and regulations of the company, by showing his ticket to the conductor when requested so to do. As a substitute for this direction, he charged that a…

2Cited by64 opinions

  1. Goddard v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
  2. Mali v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Townsend v. . N.Y. Cen. H. River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Lynch v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Weed v. . the Panama Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API