Hibbard v. . N.Y. and Erie R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In my opinion, the learned judge before whom this case was tried committed two capital errors; First. He refused to charge the jury that the plaintiff was bound to conform to the rules and regulations of the company, by showing his ticket to the conductor when requested so to do. As a substitute for this direction, he charged that a…
2Cited by64 opinions
- Goddard v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
- Mali v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Townsend v. . N.Y. Cen. H. River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Lynch v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Weed v. . the Panama Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.