Legal Opinion

Roden v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 2003No. G029574PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

The parties to a hastily drawn Code of Civil Procedure section 99 8 1 settlement agreement found themselves in litigation concerning its meaning. After numerous motions, hearings and court orders, the defendant filed an appeal from an order interpreting the judgment encapsulating the section 998 settlement agreement. The defendant requests this court to resolve once and for all just one issue out of the portly ball of wax previously at issue in this complex employment litigation: Does the lump sum payment required by the judgment include an amount for retirement benefits, or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Appleton v. WaessilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. RodenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re Tobacco Cases ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Elite Show Services, Inc. v. Staffpro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API