Legal Opinion
In Re Tobacco Cases I
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2010No. D055350PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCONNELL, P. J.
Defendant, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (Reynolds), appeals an order in favor of plaintiff, the People of the State of California, on the People’s motion for an order to enforce a consent decree (Consent Decree) entered on a master settlement agreement (MSA). Reynolds contends the trial court erred by finding that certain images it used in an advertising campaign referred to as “Camel Farm” were “cartoons” as that term is defined in the MSA. Reynolds also contends the court erred by determining it has authority to assess sanctions against it for violating the MSA and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-KerttulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Salazar v. EastinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Advanced Network, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Federal Trade Commission v. EDebitPay, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Wind Dancer Production Group v. Walt Disney PicturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.