Legal Opinion
AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Roden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2007No. 05-55349PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Concurrence by Judge FERGUSON.
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
We explore once again the sometimes complex relationship between state and federal civil proceedings when parties in the midst of litigation on one side of the divide file factually related proceedings on the other. Understandably concerned with judicial economy and respect for ongoing state proceedings, the district court dismissed the federal suit under the Younger abstention doctrine. Determining that abstention was not required, we return the *1145matter to district court to allow appellant’s diversity…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce Political Action Committee v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Karen Logan v. Us Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- William Herrera v. City of PalmdaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Potrero Hills Landfill, Inc. v. County of SolanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.