Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hanes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 6, 1999No. 96-366CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

This military pay case is before the court on cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 56.1. Plaintiff claims that she was involuntarily discharged from the United States Coast Guard (the “Coast Guard”) and seeks an award of separation pay. The issue to be decided is whether the Coast Guard’s decision to offer plaintiff a one-year extension of active duty and to reject plaintiffs offer of a “tour of duty” beyond one year amounted to an involuntary discharge, entitling plaintiff to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terrence L. Adkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Nickerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  4. Gerald F. Arens v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Stamps v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Woodruff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Kortlander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API