Legal Opinion

Young v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 31, 2009No. 09-182CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The ease currently before the court was filed by Timothy Doyle Young, a pro se plaintiff and a prisoner in the Colorado federal super-maximum prison. Plaintiff also has filed a request to proceed informa pauperis. The plaintiffs complaint seeks $25 million in damages, and “immediate protection from” the Bureau of Prisons (hereafter, BOP) and certain BOP personnel. The complaint alleges that:

The United States, Dept, of Justice, Dept, of Homeland Security, Fed. Bureau of Prisons, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, etc., have revoked the U.S. Constitution, Federal…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bobka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Resendez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Frazier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API