Nickerson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This action is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment upon the administrative record. Plaintiff opposes the motion arguing that genuine issues of material fact exist, which preclude the granting of such a motion.
Factual Background
On February 25, 1971, plaintiff enlisted and entered active duty in the United States Navy. Plaintiff served on active duty from the date of his enlistment until October 1, 1989, when he was honorably discharged with disability severance pay. At the time of his discharge, plaintiff had served on active duty for eighteen years…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Information Technology & Applications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Analytical & Research Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Ellsworth Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Metcalf Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.