Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Coyne

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 7,049PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from an order changing the place of trial, in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Sepulveda, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Thornton, J.:

This action was brought in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, against Joseph Coyne, the Sheriff of the County of San Diego, and the sureties on his official bond, to recover damages for an alleged breach by the Sheriff of the conditions in the instrument last named. Service of summons was made on all the defendants to the action in the County of San Diego, except Joseph Tasker, one of the sureties above referred to. *3The action was commenced on the 6th of January, 1880, andón the 28th of the same month a demurrer was served and filed by Chase, Parker, and Smith, who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chester v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McSherry v. Pennsylvania Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Rey v. BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Thompson v. Michigan Mutual Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. People ex rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. LarueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Ramos v. Lloveras SolerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API