Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Michigan Mutual Benefit Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1884PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Gridley J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

The defendant is a corporation organized under chapter 94 of the Compiled Laws of 18Y1 [How. St. ch. 118], and having its business office in the county of Hillsdale. The plaintiff, who is a resident of the county of Ingham, began suit by the filing of a declaration in the office of the clerk of that county, and by service of. the same on the proper officer of the defendant in the county of Hillsdale. The defendant, by attorney, filed a demurrer to the declaration, assigning nine special causes of demurrer, all of which were for formal defects. The demurrer was sustained on argument, and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Burckle v. . EckhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Lockwood v. MoliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Rowland v. CoyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. The State of New Jersey v. The People of the State of the YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cofrode v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Steel v. Clinton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Daniels v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Edwards v. MeinbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API