Chester v. Miller
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third District. For case see opinion. The complaint, in addition to the statement in the opinion, charges conspiracy on the part of defendants to defraud plaintiff out of his property; that Miller is irresponsible.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Terry, C. J. concurring.
*560Bill filed to vacate and set aside a judgment in an action of forcible entry and detainer. The bill states that judgment was rendered, by a Justice of the Peace, 3d September, 1856; that no process was served on the plaintiff, who was one of the defendants in that action; that execution issued on 5th of September, 1856, against the other defendants who had appeared, and that the defendants, finding that they could not make the money of those defendants, “some how” got possession of the Justice’s docket, and interlined the name of the plaintiff in the judgment, and also…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kwentsky v. SirovySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Pierce v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Rowland v. CoyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Gargan v. School District No. 15Supreme Court of Colorado · 1878
- Lemaire v. WalshNevada Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.