Legal Opinion

Childress Buick Co. v. O'CONNELL

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 5, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 98-0354PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

¶ 1 In this opinion, we determine whether ownership of a vehicle had passed from Ap-pellee Childress Buick to the prospective buyer of the vehicle at the time Appellant Richard O’Connell rear-ended the vehicle with the buyer in possession pursuant to an attempted, but ultimately unsuccessful, purchase of the vehicle. In determining that ownership had not passed and that O’Con-nells’ insurer was therefore wrong in paying the prospective buyer and not Childress for the vehicle damage, we decide that Cavazos v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc., 104 Ariz. 540, 456 P.2d 910…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Creach v. AnguloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Heltzel v. Mecham PontiacArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Lansford v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Creach v. AnguloArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cavazos v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Crystal E. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Aztar Corp. v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. In Re Andrew C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Meiners v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API