Legal Opinion
Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 27, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 06-0556PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant/appellant Cannon & Wendt Electric Co., Inc. (C & W) appeals a judgment in favor of plaintiff/appellee Tamula S. Bogard on Bogard’s claims of gender-based discrimination and retaliation. For the following reasons, we vacate the portion of the judgment awarding Bogard damages for mental pain and suffering and affirm the remainder of the judgment as modified herein.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Bogard’s employment with C & W
¶ 2 Bogard was employed by C & W as an electrician from approximately March 1997 until October 1999. On August 13, 1999, Bogard filed…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Jeanette J. PLUMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INTERNATIONAL HOTELS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Selby v. SavardArizona Supreme Court · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. SourantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Span v. MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Desarrollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo, S.A. De C v. v. Kader Holdings Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.