Legal Opinion
Lansford v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 20, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 90-388PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Presiding Judge.
Appellant Cecily S. Lansford challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment that dismissed her legal malpractice action because it constituted relitigation of an issue previously litigated and decided against her. In the cross-appeal, appellees Harris (collectively “Harris”) argue that the trial court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment asserting that the statute of limitations barred Lansford’s claim.
FACTS
Lansford and her husband filed a joint bankruptcy petition in 1983. Harris represented the Lansfords in litigation concerning the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chaney Building Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Contempo Construction Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Arizona Management Corp. v. KallofCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cody Farms, Inc. v. Deerman (In re Deerman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Brunacini v. KavanaghNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Childress Buick Co. v. O'CONNELLCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Schoneberger v. OelzeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.