Legal Opinion

Crawford v. . Crawford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1939PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

The only question presented on this appeal: Is plaintiff estopped by the decree of the partition proceeding to claim interest in land in question under alleged parol agreement with defendant?

Appellant presents this question on exception to refusal of motions for judgment as of nonsuit, and on exceptive assignments to these portions of the charge of the court: (1) “There has been offered in evidence a partition proceeding. I instruct you, as & matter of law, that if you find as contended for by the plaintiff, that his brother John bought the land for him at his request, with the oral…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  3. State v. . FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Southern Distributing Co. v. CarrawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Hare v. . WeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Atkins v. White Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Zayas Pizarro v. Autoridad de TierrasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  5. Stansel v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API