Legal Opinion

In Re Renfrow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1957No. 146PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Except in cases involving the custody of minor children, G.S. 17-40, no appeal lies from a judgment rendered on return to a writ of habeas corpus. In re Steele, 220 N.C. 685, 687, 18 S.E. 2d 132, and cases cited. The remedy, if any, is by petition for a writ of certiorari, addressed to the sound discretion of this Court. In re Lee Croom, 175 N.C. 455, 95 S.E. 903.

Under the rules stated, petitioner’s purported appeal would be dismissed. However, to clarify the important question of practice presented by the record, this Court deems it appropriate to treat petitioner’s purported appeal as a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. In Re CroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. NiccumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API