Legal Opinion

Davis v. Franson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1956No. Civ. 4996PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONLEY, J. pro tem. *

Maurice M. Davis, a Texas attorney, and his wife, with their friends, Mr. and Mrs. W. T. Scully, were approaching the city of Fresno in the Davis automobile on Highway 99 when the defendant Franson drove his car at a leisurely pace across the roadway in front of them. The resulting collision caused injuries to all of the plaintiffs, ranging in severity from serious for Mrs. Davis to slight for the Scullys.

The two principal questions submitted to the jury were whether the defendant Oscar Wilhelm Franson was negligent, and whether the plaintiffs were guilty of contributory…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Eramdjian v. Interstate Bakery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Hildebrand v. Los Angeles Junction Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Barlin v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API