Legal Opinion

Brokmeier v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1927No. 25,742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying compensation.

The employer was engaged in the coal and wood business in Moorhead. Fifth and Sixth streets of that city extend north and south and are intersected at right angles by a railroad right of way upon which are four or five tracks. Immediately to the south of the right of way, on the westerly half of the block between the two streets, are yards, sheds, stables and the office of the employer, who also has coal sheds immediately north of and adjacent to the north track and extending along the west half of the distance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Christensen v. Hauff Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Shonk Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Kaselnak v. Fruit DispatchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API