Kaselnak v. Fruit Dispatch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Certiorari brings for review the propriety of an order of the industrial commission denying relator-employe compensation.
On and prior to June 25, 1987, Kaselnak, the employe, was engaged by respondent Fruit Dispatch as a messenger to accompany carloads of fruit shipped to consignees in the trade territory of the employer in this country and in Canada. On his last trip, the one giving rise to the accident here involved, he accompanied two carloads of bananas from Minneapolis to Weyburn, Saskatchewan, located some 500 miles west of Winnipeg. The shipment was routed over…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State ex rel. Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Campbell v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Snyder v. General Paper CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Weidenbach v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Brusven v. BallordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- McBride v. Preston Creamery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Kerpen v. Bill Boyer Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.