Legal Opinion

People v. Maikhio

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2011No. S180289PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

To protect and preserve the wildlife of the state for current and future generations, California—like other states—has adopted numerous statutes and regulations governing the conduct of persons who fish or hunt in this state, prescribing, for example, the places where fishing or hunting may occur, the seasons in which particular species may be taken, the number and size of different types of fish or animals that may be caught or shot, the means by which particular types of wildlife may be taken, and the licenses, permits, and records required for different fishing…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matthew Tarabochia v. Mickey AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. BoulterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Yee v. American National Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API