Legal Opinion

People v. Boulter

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 2011No. B230788PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION. Defendant and appellant Brian Boulter (defendant) pleaded no contest to possession for sale of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378). *765On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We hold that a search of the jail lockers into which defendant, a jail visitor, put belongings was, under the circumstances, an appropriate and valid administrative search. Thus, we affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background1

At the time of defendant’s arrest, the lockers at the Men’s Central Jail in Los…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Olvera v. City of ModestoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  3. People v. Blair CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Hammons CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API