Yee v. American National Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
Consistent with unclaimed property laws nationwide that derive from a uniform act on the subject, California’s Unclaimed Property Law (the UPL; Code Civ. Proc., § 1500 et seq.)1 is remedial legislation with a dual objective. That dual objective is to end the fortuitous enrichment of holders of unclaimed property and to return such property to its rightful owner or, if that is not possible, to the state (i.e., escheat) for public benefit rather than for private gain. (See 13 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th ed. 2005) Personal Property, §§ 36-38, pp. 44-46; Goldstein v. PHH…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Walter Camp v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Anderson v. JosephCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. MaikhioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Comptroller of Treasury v. PHH Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. North River Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- People v. Uber Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Uber Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020