Legal Opinion
Matthew Tarabochia v. Mickey Adkins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 2014No. 11-35837PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a suspicionless roving automobile stop of commercial fishers made while they drive on a public highway to investigate compliance with Washington fish and game laws constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment and, if so, whether this right was clearly established as of the time of the stop at issue in this case. Because we determine that this stop, which lacked any basis in suspicion of unlawful behavior or statutory authority that would render it permissible under the administrative search…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Isayeva v. Sacramento Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- John Entler v. Christine GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Desiree Martinez v. City of ClovisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ullery v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Ted Bradford v. Joseph ScherschligtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.