Legal Opinion

Ladum v. Utility Cartage, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1966No. 37740PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in its determination that the written contract involved was ambiguous. The facts are substantially as follows:

Utility Cartage, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the company) , owns a concrete building which had been constructed in two portions. The old portion was built in 1927 (and enlarged in 1946), with concrete mullions 12 inches wide and 8 inches thick, approximately 20 feet apart, which ex tended perpendicularly from the base of the building to within 1 foot of the top. Superimposed and centered on each mullion was a 4…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Durand v. HeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hastings v. Continental Food Sales, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Wells & Wade Hardware, Inc. v. City of WenatcheeWashington Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. McGary v. Westlake InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Murray v. Western Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Syrovy v. Alpine Resources, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. R. A. Hanson Co. v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Carlstrom v. HanlineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API