Legal Opinion
Durand v. Heney
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1903No. 4686PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Bell, J., entered December 8, 1902, upon tbe verdict of a jury rendered in favor of tbe defendant by direction of tbe court.
1Opinion of the Court
Dunbar J.
This is an action for damages for the alleged breach of the following written contract:
“Memorandum of Agreement between Chas. E. Severance of Skagway, Alaska, and The Red Line Transportation Co., by its manager M. J. Heney, Witnesseth.
“That the said Chas. E. Severance agrees to haul and deliver freight in a good condition from Summit of White Pass to Atlin City, B. C., for the price of twelve (12) cents per pound. And The Red Line Transportation Co. by its manager M. J. Heney agrees to pay the above price per pound for all freight safely delivered at its destination. The said company…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Warner v. Miltenberger's LesseeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Wooster v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1839
- Carstens v. EarlesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
- Murray v. Western Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Ladum v. Utility Cartage, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
- Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.