Legal Opinion
Miller v. Allstate Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1965No. 37557PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, J. †
The plaintiffs brought this action to secure a judgment declaring that a bodily injury liability insurance policy issued to them by the defendant be interpreted to provide primary insurance coverage or in the alternative excess coverage for damages over and above any other insurance available to them.
The plaintiff Mary Miller was seriously injured in an accident which occurred July 28, 1962. At that time, she was a passenger in an automobile owned by her brother, Elmer Anderson, and being then driven by her son. The accident was a head-on collision with an automobile driven by an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- American Automobile Insurance v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Burcham v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.