Legal Opinion
States Shingle Co. v. Kaufman
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1964No. Civ. 10798PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Sole question on appeal is whether this materialman’s lien foreclosure action is barred by failure to commence it in “a proper court” within the 90-day period fixed by Code of Civil Procedure section 1198.1. 1
Plaintiff supplied building materials worth $2,269.23 to Friedli, a general contractor, for use in constructing a build ing on defendants’ property in El Dorado County. The materials were used in construction of the building but plaintiff was never paid. On February 19, 1960, plaintiff filed a claim of lien in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder. Exactly 90 days later, on May 19,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Thomasian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Howard v. Societa Di Unione E Beneficenza ItalianaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Packard Bell Electronics Corp. v. Theseus, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Petersen v. W. T. Grant Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re Paul Potts Builders, Inc., Bankrupt. William B. Grover, Trustee v. The County of MarinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Robinson v. S & S DevelopmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.