Legal Opinion
Robinson v. S & S Development
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1967No. Civ. 32030PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCOY, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from that part of a judgment of the Municipal Court of the Los Angeles Judicial District which decreed the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The Appellate Department of the Superior Court for Los Angeles County affirmed the judgment. On its certification to us, we transferred the appeal to this court under rule 62, California Rules of Court.
The question before us is whether the 90-day period for commencing proceedings for enforcement of mechanic’s liens provided by section 1198.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a statute of limitations affecting the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Alter v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Borchers Bros. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Howard v. Societa Di Unione E Beneficenza ItalianaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- AAA Fencing Co. v. Raintree Development & Energy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
- Petersen v. W. T. Grant Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re Paul Potts Builders, Inc., Bankrupt. William B. Grover, Trustee v. The County of MarinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Automatic Sprinkler Corp. v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lee v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.