Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1997No. 17754PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1. NMSA 1978, Section 52-1-54 (Cum. Supp.1996) governs attorney fees in workers’ compensation cases. Section 52-l-54(C) permits the workers’ compensation judge to fix a fee when its jurisdiction is invoked to approve a settlement. Section 52-l-54(H) requires the judge, in setting the fee, to “consider only those benefits to the worker that the attorney is responsible for securing.” The question we address in this case is whether a determination that Employer is not entitled to reimbursement under NMSA 1978, Section 52-5-17 (Repl.Pamp.1991) (effective January 1,1991) is a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Perez v. Fred Harvey, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Livingston v. Loffland Brothers Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Haaland v. BaltzleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mann v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Titus v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Sanchez v. SaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Pesch v. Boddington Lumber Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Martinez v. Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Titus v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API