Legal Opinion

Pesch v. Boddington Lumber Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1998No. 18346PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1.The question in this appeal is whether a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) may, in determining an award of attorney fees, consider adversely the fact that the worker’s counsel engaged in the permissible practice of communicating with a witness prior to trial. We hold that it depends on the particular facts of the case. In this case, the WCJ reduced the award of attorney fees from a straight hours-times-hourly-rate amount because counsel had an ex parte communication with the worker’s treating physician. Because the WCJ found the amount of hours expended by counsel to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Woodson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Manzanares v. Lerner's, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. County of Bernalillo v. SisnerosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. Zanio's Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Vinyard v. Palo Alto, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Chavarria v. Basin Moving & StorageNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API