Pesch v. Boddington Lumber Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
1.The question in this appeal is whether a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) may, in determining an award of attorney fees, consider adversely the fact that the worker’s counsel engaged in the permissible practice of communicating with a witness prior to trial. We hold that it depends on the particular facts of the case. In this case, the WCJ reduced the award of attorney fees from a straight hours-times-hourly-rate amount because counsel had an ex parte communication with the worker’s treating physician. Because the WCJ found the amount of hours expended by counsel to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Woodson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Manzanares v. Lerner's, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- County of Bernalillo v. SisnerosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanchez v. Zanio's Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Vinyard v. Palo Alto, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Chavarria v. Basin Moving & StorageNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017