Legal Opinion
Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 1995No. 15882PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
The Opinion filed herein on November 2, 1995, is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor. Employer’s Motion for Rehearing is denied.
This appeal involves the Workers’ Compensation Act’s (the Act) attorney fee section. See NMSA 1978, § 52-1-54 (Repl.Pamp.1991 & Cum.Supp.1995). Appellant Taos Ski Valley, Inc. (Employer) challenges (1) the amount of attorney fees awarded to Orlando Cordova (Worker) as excessive and unreasonable, and (2) the order requiring Employer to pay 100% of Worker’s attorney fees as a violation of Section 52-l-54(J). We affirm the amount of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Woodson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Genuine Parts Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Mascarenas v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Herndon v. Albuquerque Public SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ettenson v. BurkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Williams v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- State v. QuiñonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ramirez v. IBP Prepared FoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. QuinonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.