Legal Opinion
Haaland v. Baltzley
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1990No. 18685PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
Plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking to recover their interest in a horse business. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $61,938.50. The trial court entered judgment in the amount of the jury verdict plus costs. Defendant appeals the judgment and plaintiffs cross appeal. We affirm the trial court.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The plaintiffs Haaland and defendant Clifford A. Baltzley and his wife Nola Baltzley entered into an oral agreement in the summer of 1984 to acquire, promote, breed and sell Norwegian Fjord horses. The parties intended that they would be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Shaeffer v. KeltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Getz v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of USNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Toltec International, Inc. v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- American Telephone & Tel. Co. of Wyo. v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc. v. North River InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Public Service Co. v. Diamond D Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Fleetwood Retail Corp. of NM v. LeDouxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Sunwest Bank of Albuquerque, N.A. v. ColucciNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- American National Property & Casualty Co. v. ClevelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.