State ex rel. Kemper v. Carter
Supreme Court of Missouri
Mandamus. (1) -Mandamus is a proper remedy to compel the issuance of a license to keep a dramshop, if the dram-shop law was in force in Mexico, Missouri, when the license was refused, and the Local Option election was illegal and void. State ex rel. v. Turner, 210' Mo. 77; State ex rel. v. Ross, 160' Mo. App. 682; State ex rel. v. Ross, 161 Mo.
Read the full summary
Mandamus. (1) -Mandamus is a proper remedy to compel the issuance of a license to keep a dramshop, if the dram-shop law was in force in Mexico, Missouri, when the license was refused, and the Local Option election was illegal and void. State ex rel. v. Turner, 210' Mo. 77; State ex rel. v. Ross, 160' Mo. App. 682; State ex rel. v. Ross, 161 Mo. App. 671. (2) The election in Mexico, on October 27, 1913, was illeg’al and void and of no effect and the dramshop law was not suspended, because the city council of the city of Mexico failed to order the same according to the provisions of Sec. 7239,…
1Opinion of the CourtFaeis, J.
Eelator, a citizen of the city of Mexico, in Audrain county, Missouri, brings this original proceeding by mandamus against respondents, who are respectively the three judges and the clerk of the county court of said county, to compel the renewal of his dramshop license as such renewal is provided for by section 7206, Eevised Statutes 1909.
After the filing herein of relator’s petition and of the return of the respondents to our preliminary rule, W. C. Hughes, Esq., of the Montgomery County bar, was appointed commissioner to take testimony and make up for us findings of facts. All of this has…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Stevens v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Maloney v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Nance v. KearbeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Peabody v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Abbey v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Pitman v. DrabelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- State ex rel. Collins v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1919
- Stockburger v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.