Mack v. Jastro
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern ■County. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
—Plaintiff, as a resident and taxpayer of Kern county, brought this action to enjoin the defendants, the board of supervisors of the county, from carrying out a contract entered into between them and the intervener, relative to the sale of refunding bonds of the county. The court decreed a perpetual injunction, and from the judgment the defendants and the intervenor prosecute separate appeals, which, however, may be considered together.
Before the proposition to issue the refunding bonds in question had been submitted to and acted upon by the electors of the county, the supervisors had entered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- King v. CornellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Fisk v. HenarieSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- District of Columbia v. HuttonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of Los Angeles v. TeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- People v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.