Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Dahlheimer

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2000No. 98-111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The only question in this appeal is whether each of the survivors of a decedent who had contracted for uninsured motorist coverage qualified as an insured person so as to invoke the $300,000 limit of coverage for an occur rence rather than the $100,000 limit of coverage for a person. The district court ruled that each of the survivors was an insured under the policy and that the higher $300,000 limit would apply. We interpret the specific provision of the policy dealing with the uninsured motorist coverage as limiting the coverage to bodily injuries sustained by the insured…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Treichel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rouse v. MunroeWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Century Ready-Mix Co. v. Campbell County School DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Knowles v. CorkillWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Principal Life Insurance Co. v. Summit Well Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. O'Donnell v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Cheyenne v. Board of CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Soran v. SoranWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API