Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Munroe

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1983No. 5760PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

In this appeal we are asked to review the district court’s construction of an easement owned by appellant John Rouse. The ease ment has as its purpose the maintaining of a stock-watering reservoir on a portion of appellee Ernest W. Munroe’s property. In the district court proceeding Munroe sued Rouse, alleging that water in the reservoir was inundating more land than authorized by the easement. Following the trial, the district judge decided that the terms of the easement only permitted the reservoir to encompass ten acres of appellee’s property. A judgment was therefore entered…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Shepard v. Top Hat Land & Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Peters Grazing Association v. LegerskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Mobil Coal Producing, Inc. v. ParksWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Arnold v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API