Legal Opinion

Gulf Insurance Co. v. Clark

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2001No. 00-597PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Gulf Insurance Company (Gulf) and Security Insurance of Hartford (Security) appeal the summary judgment entered by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, in favor of the Defendants, Donald Clark and Clark and Associates, Inc. (Clark). Gulf and Security contend that the District Court erred as a matter of law by applying the wrong statute of limitations to their claim brought under Montana’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.

¶2 We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 This controversy commenced in April of 1995, when Gulf and Security brought an action in federal district…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cortez v. VogtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Erker v. KesterMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Spinler v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Rase v. Castle Mountain Ranch, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marc H. Nathan v. Stephen WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Wing v. DockstaderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Schnidt v. HSC, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wing v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationMontana Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API