Legal Opinion

Schnidt v. HSC, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2014No. SCWC-29454PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that, in accordance with the text of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 651C-9(1) (1993) 1 pertaining to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act (UFTA 2 ), that the one year limitations period that begins on the date a transfer “was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant” commences when a plaintiff discovers or could reasonably have discovered a transfer’s fraudulent nature. The Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA), however, held that the limitations period begins when the transfer, rather than its fraudulent nature, is discovered, and…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Gibson v. TrantTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Potts v. Celotex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Leslie v. Board of AppealsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. SASCO 1997 NI, LLC v. ZudkewichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brian Bash v. Textron Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. In re: Doron Ezra Nava Tomer EzraUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Heejoon Chung v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
  5. Potter v. Alliance United Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API