Legal Opinion

Marc H. Nathan v. Stephen Whittington

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2013No. 12-0628PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

We must decide in this case whether a statute that “suspends the running” of a “statute of limitations” applies to a statute of repose that otherwise “extinguishes” the plaintiffs cause of action. The trial court held that it does not and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The court of appeals, with one justice dissenting, held that it does and reversed. We hold that the suspension statute does not apply to a statute of repose, so we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the trial court’s summary judgment.

Stephen Whittington initially filed suit in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. JoachimTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Loaisiga v. CerdaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Galbraith Engineering Consultants, Inc. v. PochuchaTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Gary Wayne Jaster v. Comet II Construction, Inc., Joe H. Schneider, Laura H. Schneider, and Austin Design GroupTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Ralph S. Janvey, in His Capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank, Limited Official Stanford Investors Committee v. the Golf Channel, Incorporated Tgc, L.L.C., Doing Business as Golf ChannelTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Lewis v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  4. National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Jenkins v. Crosby Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API