Legal Opinion

Moore v. Browning

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 25, 2002No. 2 SA-CA 2002-0021PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Eric Gregory Moore and Patricia Moore, defendants in the underlying action for breach of contract and fraudulent transfer, seek special action relief from the respondent judge’s order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. In that mo tion, the Moores had asked the judge to dismiss the cause of action for fraudulent transfer filed by real parties in interest Leon Ulan and Sylvia Ulan on the ground the cause of action has been extinguished by the statute of repose in the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). A.R.S. §§ 44-1001 through 44-1010. In…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Walk v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. VallejosArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. SASCO 1997 NI, LLC v. ZudkewichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Brian Bash v. Textron Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. Marc H. Nathan v. Stephen WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Fleet National Bank v. Valente (In Re Valente)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. State v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API