Legal Opinion

Dumas v. City of Sunnyvale

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1965No. Civ. 21338PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.

This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief brought by a number of property owners in the city against the City of Sunnyvale.

The controversy arises out of the steps taken by the City of Sunnyvale with respect to the widening of one of its main streets. On June 24, 1958, the city council adopted a resolution of intention to widen, improve and extend Fairoaks Avenue and to set up an assessment district to bear the costs and expenses thereof. On the same date, it appointed July 15, 1958, as the date on which it would hear protests to the proposed improvements. Plaintiffs, owners of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Jenner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Thain v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Saks & Co. v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Albonico v. Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Town of Los Altos HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Baker v. WadsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Bowles v. AntonettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API