Legal Opinion
City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 1976No. Civ. 46813PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
The consolidated cases at bench arise out of action by the City Council of Rolling Hills Estates vacating a public street and providing for its future relocation in order to permit development of a 14*/2-acre shopping center.
Streets and Highways Code section 8323 provides that a city street may be vacated only if after a public hearing on notice “the city council finds, from all the evidence submitted, that any street or part thereof ... is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes . . . .” Public Resources Code section 21168, part of the California…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Twain Harte Homeowners Ass'n v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Karlson v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Howard v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Del Mar Terrace Conservancy, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Greenebaum v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.