Legal Opinion
Lipson v. Jordache Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 1992No. A054706PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J. *
This case concerns an insurance company’s attempt to have a posttrial judgment against its insured set aside after it initially declined to undertake the defense.
On May 12, 1989, plaintiff George Lipson filed a complaint for damages against defendants Jordache Enterprises, Inc., Ditto Apparel of California, Inc., Missy Creations, Ltd., and Ralph Nakash (collectively defendant or Jordache), alleging breach of contract and fraud. Plaintiff alleged he had worked as a commissioned sales representative for defendant (clothing manufacturers) from February 1981 until his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Mullen v. Glens Falls InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lynch v. SpilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Dyer v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pruyn v. Agricultural InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Lynette C.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Modern Development Co. v. Navigators InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Eigner v. WorthingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.