Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Glens Falls Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 6, 1977No. Civ. 2872PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARGANO, Acting P. J.
On July 22, 1967, defendant Glens Falls Insurance Company (hereafter Glens Falls) issued a comprehensive personal liability policy to Joe and Dorothy Santos; the policy named the Santoses as the insureds and included, as additional insureds, all residents of their household who were related to, or were under the age of 21 years and in the care of, either of them. It also contained these pertinent provisions: “The company will pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Walters v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Davis v. Air Technical Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.