Legal Opinion
Dyer v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1989No. B034700PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
Introduction
On August 5, 1987, plaintiff Daniel E. Dyer filed a complaint for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and for violation of Insurance Code section 790.03 against defendant Northbrook Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Northbrook), Central Mutual Insurance Company, and 200 unnamed defendants.
On November 17, 1987, Judge Miriam A. Vogel sustained Northbrook’s demurrer to Dyer’s complaint, but granted Dyer 30 days to file an amended complaint. Dyer filed his amended complaint on December 22, 1987. On January 20,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Johansen v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- George R. Chamberlain, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Allstate Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Collin v. American Empire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- B & E Convalescent Center v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Loyola Marymount University v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.