Eigner v. Worthington
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, Acting P. J.
In an action arising from hostilities between two neighboring families, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) refused to defend its insured, Gloria Worthington, having determined— without any investigation beyond merely comparing the complaint’s allegations with coverage provisions—there was no policy coverage for the alleged injuries. Later, potentially facing liability for a $240,700 judgment entered against Worthington for covered injuries, as well as tort liability, State Farm intervened and moved to have the judgment vacated based on its “mistake,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Episcopal Church v. Church InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
- Everett Associates, Inc. v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Hinton v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- The Housing Group v. Pma Capital InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Butler v. Clarendon America InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.